Exploring the alignment of multi-agent systems with human values during group process is an essential step towards the development of artificial general intelligence. In this work, we present a novel approach to systematically evaluate factors that influence the value orientation of large language models (LLMs) in simulating human group process. Our proposed framework, which requires neither fine-tuning nor pre-training, enables LLMs to simulate debates among personas on a given topic, autonomously assess response confidence, and retrieve external information to enhance low-confidence responses. We conduct comparative experiments using the same framework with human participants. Additionally, we introduce a comprehensive set of evaluation metrics to reveal discrepancies in value orientation alignment between LLM systems and human systems in group process.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Evaluating Human-Large Language Model Alignment in Group Process

  • Yidong He,
  • Yongbin Liu,
  • Chunping Ouyang,
  • Huan Liu,
  • Wenyong Han,
  • Yu Gao,
  • Chi Zhu,
  • Yi Tang,
  • Jin Zhong,
  • Shuda Zhou,
  • Le Huang

摘要

Exploring the alignment of multi-agent systems with human values during group process is an essential step towards the development of artificial general intelligence. In this work, we present a novel approach to systematically evaluate factors that influence the value orientation of large language models (LLMs) in simulating human group process. Our proposed framework, which requires neither fine-tuning nor pre-training, enables LLMs to simulate debates among personas on a given topic, autonomously assess response confidence, and retrieve external information to enhance low-confidence responses. We conduct comparative experiments using the same framework with human participants. Additionally, we introduce a comprehensive set of evaluation metrics to reveal discrepancies in value orientation alignment between LLM systems and human systems in group process.