This study investigates the happiness and depression levels of architecture students at Rajiv Gandhi Institute of Technology during the 2023–2024 academic year. Using the Subjective Happiness Scale (SHS), initial findings revealed that 50% of students reported higher happiness levels upon joining the program compared to the average college student. However, happiness levels generally declined in higher semesters, with the exception of the third year (S6), where peer support, positive attitudes, and excitement about internships led to increased well-being. Despite graphical trends suggesting variations, ANOVA results showed no statistically significant differences in happiness and depression scores across semesters. CES-D Depression Scale findings revealed consistently high depression rates, peaking in the final year. To validate these observations, in-person interviews were conducted with five recent graduates, providing insights into happiness fluctuations throughout their academic journey. A survey incorporating activities validated by psychologist Sonja Lyubomirsky identified acts of kindness and gratitude as universally effective in enhancing happiness, resonating with students across all years. This study highlights the need for integrating tailored happiness activities and institutional support systems within architectural education. By addressing both happiness and depression, these interventions can foster a supportive academic environment, improving student well-being and enabling a balanced educational experience. Ultimately, such measures can enhance the holistic development and success of architecture students.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Assessing Levels of Happiness among Architecture Students: A Study at Rajiv Gandhi Institute of Technology Using the Subjective Happiness Scale and Identifying Optimal Happiness Activities

  • Reenu George,
  • Binumol Tom

摘要

This study investigates the happiness and depression levels of architecture students at Rajiv Gandhi Institute of Technology during the 2023–2024 academic year. Using the Subjective Happiness Scale (SHS), initial findings revealed that 50% of students reported higher happiness levels upon joining the program compared to the average college student. However, happiness levels generally declined in higher semesters, with the exception of the third year (S6), where peer support, positive attitudes, and excitement about internships led to increased well-being. Despite graphical trends suggesting variations, ANOVA results showed no statistically significant differences in happiness and depression scores across semesters. CES-D Depression Scale findings revealed consistently high depression rates, peaking in the final year. To validate these observations, in-person interviews were conducted with five recent graduates, providing insights into happiness fluctuations throughout their academic journey. A survey incorporating activities validated by psychologist Sonja Lyubomirsky identified acts of kindness and gratitude as universally effective in enhancing happiness, resonating with students across all years. This study highlights the need for integrating tailored happiness activities and institutional support systems within architectural education. By addressing both happiness and depression, these interventions can foster a supportive academic environment, improving student well-being and enabling a balanced educational experience. Ultimately, such measures can enhance the holistic development and success of architecture students.