As AI progresses quickly, serious concerns arise about protecting the copyright for its products. Each country views AI as an author while maintaining rights differently, resulting in the compelling necessity for an international dialogue on legal standards. The present copyright framework does not provide sufficient solutions for AI authorship intricacies and raises doubts about classic notions of invention and source. The distinctions show an instant demand for a global legal system that can address the particular characteristics of AI-generated content. Investigating legal policies for AI-created works underscores the critical demand for a copyright approach that accounts for human involvement. Recognizing the actual owner and the original creator is complicated when AI operates with substantial control. Present statutes fail to clarify the complexities linked to human artistic contributions. The idea behind developing a single system suggests valuing AI-produced material as a unique category of intellectual property. This initiative might change how we define authorship in digital works by requiring either AI ownership or that of its creators. AI and individuals could collaborate to create projects that connect creativity with established copyright standards. The critical viewpoint is usually overlooked in media reports, and AI's governance is presented without a thorough evaluation of linked laws and ethics. The existing bias may distort the truth for the public and influence choices while ignoring important information. Legal dialogues must also be enhanced as AI becomes more significant in creativity. Designed approaches strive to build improved regulations that represent progress in technology and the basic concepts of copyright. Developing a consistent policy model to confront AI obstacles related to intellectual property demands this investigation and its recommended advice.