The consequent set of essential sound governance principles prioritizes broad inclusivity, transparency, and consent-based approaches to decisions and rules. The crucial promise inherent in the concept of peace and inclusivity, combined with the idea of good governance, is about the belief that the selection of people and processes will generate sustainable governance outcomes and development benefits. In other words, it recognizes that peace and justice are agendas for development in themselves. Through overlapping, interconnected, or co-dependent thematic areas, SDG 16 aspires to address a wide array of programmatic and conceptual challenges that cut across international development systems. Reflecting the need to focus on these program materials and re-sourcing all governance areas that are fundamentally core to the agenda, the only standalone non-governmental goal (or institutional arrangement) remains principles in the context of resilient governance, justice, and peace. The Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union is classified as a “basic human rights” title, addressed separately in the fundamental commitment to the transformation. But this also acknowledges the complexity of the purpose of this limited paper, coinciding with the corresponding space and approaches the topic in detail in the development headquarters peace and development agenda. In particular, it is about how digital tools and technologies can improve SDG outcomes by empowering governance processes by combining this digital governance.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

SDG 16: Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions—Digital Tools for Good Governance

  • Wasswa Shafik

摘要

The consequent set of essential sound governance principles prioritizes broad inclusivity, transparency, and consent-based approaches to decisions and rules. The crucial promise inherent in the concept of peace and inclusivity, combined with the idea of good governance, is about the belief that the selection of people and processes will generate sustainable governance outcomes and development benefits. In other words, it recognizes that peace and justice are agendas for development in themselves. Through overlapping, interconnected, or co-dependent thematic areas, SDG 16 aspires to address a wide array of programmatic and conceptual challenges that cut across international development systems. Reflecting the need to focus on these program materials and re-sourcing all governance areas that are fundamentally core to the agenda, the only standalone non-governmental goal (or institutional arrangement) remains principles in the context of resilient governance, justice, and peace. The Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union is classified as a “basic human rights” title, addressed separately in the fundamental commitment to the transformation. But this also acknowledges the complexity of the purpose of this limited paper, coinciding with the corresponding space and approaches the topic in detail in the development headquarters peace and development agenda. In particular, it is about how digital tools and technologies can improve SDG outcomes by empowering governance processes by combining this digital governance.