Since the adoption of the STG, there have been a series of arguments and counterarguments regarding its potency in ending conflicts in Africa and vice versa. These violent conflicts involve a range of local, regional, and international actors. They are also increasingly transnational with the rising profile of extremist organizations with global connections. This has created fertile grounds for widespread human rights violations by non-state actors and security forces against a backdrop of eroding democracy. This underscores the need to take proactive action to ensure early intervention that prevents the escalation of conflict by developing and relying on robust early warning mechanisms and signals.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Conclusion

  • Nicholas Idris Erameh,
  • Ntsikelelo Benjamin Breakfast,
  • Efem Nkam Ubi

摘要

Since the adoption of the STG, there have been a series of arguments and counterarguments regarding its potency in ending conflicts in Africa and vice versa. These violent conflicts involve a range of local, regional, and international actors. They are also increasingly transnational with the rising profile of extremist organizations with global connections. This has created fertile grounds for widespread human rights violations by non-state actors and security forces against a backdrop of eroding democracy. This underscores the need to take proactive action to ensure early intervention that prevents the escalation of conflict by developing and relying on robust early warning mechanisms and signals.