The rural areas of Iran face various challenges, such as water scarcity, climate change impacts, economic fluctuations, limited access to services, migrations, and abandonment. Rural resilience is essential to maintain socio-economic and environmental systems while withstanding and recovering from challenges. Rural policy-making and planning focusing on rural revitalization, maintaining stability, and living standards can promote rural resilience and contribute to sustainable rural development. The centralized, sectoral, non-regional, and top-down policy-making system functions as the main phenomenon in the current pattern of rural development in Iran, which is a consequence of the weakness of intellectual and theoretical foundations in rural policy-making. Furthermore, it is recommended to achieve rural development and resilience, it is suggested that integrated sectoral-spatial policy-making should be the focus, and spatial policies should receive more attention with a relative reduction of sectoralism. Also, to achieve sustainable rural development, it is recommended to implement a spatial planning and policy system based on a network and hybrid approach to rural development. This system should cater to the unique needs of rural societies and be in harmony with their conditions. This can be achieved by emulating successful examples implemented by member countries of organizations like Economic Cooperation Organization (ECO), the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), and the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC). In addition, it is important to continue formulating and implementing Iran’s novel models of rural development that have been successful in recent years, such as the Rural Constellations Sustainable Development Plan (RCSD), the Economic Development and Rural Employment Plan (EDRE), the Underprivileged Foundation Development and Progress Plan (UFDP), the Comprehensive Model for the Progress of Deprived and Rural Areas with the Kowsari development approach of the Barakat Foundation (Sahab, Asman, Aftab, and Mahtab), and the Roostatish projects (economic, social, and socio-economic). These new patterns emphasize investment in places rather than sectors and improving socio-economic and environmental-physical status. The study’s findings provide valuable insights for policy-makers, planners, and researchers on how to enhance the resilience and sustainability of rural communities in Iran.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Resilience for Rural Sustainable Development in Iran: Challenges and Approaches

  • Mostefa Abiyat,
  • Morteza Abiyat

摘要

The rural areas of Iran face various challenges, such as water scarcity, climate change impacts, economic fluctuations, limited access to services, migrations, and abandonment. Rural resilience is essential to maintain socio-economic and environmental systems while withstanding and recovering from challenges. Rural policy-making and planning focusing on rural revitalization, maintaining stability, and living standards can promote rural resilience and contribute to sustainable rural development. The centralized, sectoral, non-regional, and top-down policy-making system functions as the main phenomenon in the current pattern of rural development in Iran, which is a consequence of the weakness of intellectual and theoretical foundations in rural policy-making. Furthermore, it is recommended to achieve rural development and resilience, it is suggested that integrated sectoral-spatial policy-making should be the focus, and spatial policies should receive more attention with a relative reduction of sectoralism. Also, to achieve sustainable rural development, it is recommended to implement a spatial planning and policy system based on a network and hybrid approach to rural development. This system should cater to the unique needs of rural societies and be in harmony with their conditions. This can be achieved by emulating successful examples implemented by member countries of organizations like Economic Cooperation Organization (ECO), the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), and the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC). In addition, it is important to continue formulating and implementing Iran’s novel models of rural development that have been successful in recent years, such as the Rural Constellations Sustainable Development Plan (RCSD), the Economic Development and Rural Employment Plan (EDRE), the Underprivileged Foundation Development and Progress Plan (UFDP), the Comprehensive Model for the Progress of Deprived and Rural Areas with the Kowsari development approach of the Barakat Foundation (Sahab, Asman, Aftab, and Mahtab), and the Roostatish projects (economic, social, and socio-economic). These new patterns emphasize investment in places rather than sectors and improving socio-economic and environmental-physical status. The study’s findings provide valuable insights for policy-makers, planners, and researchers on how to enhance the resilience and sustainability of rural communities in Iran.