Scholarlink

Smart technologies in educational platforms need a new vision to organize attributes and characteristics that facilitate search and retrieval. This study reports the evaluation results of Open Educational Platforms (OEPs) in Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts, and Mathematics (STEAM). In a webinar, participants selected OEPs using a structured instrument provided during the session. The instrument includes a two-section rubric. The first section validates the obligatory metadata and adherence to an open license. The second quantitatively assesses the quality of the OEPs in seven dimensions. The questions guiding this research were: Which OEPs in STEAM aligned with the principles of open education scored the highest quality assessment, and in which dimensions? Which dimensions obtained the lowest means? 1) The highest-scoring STEAM OEPs were Khan Academy and GeoGebra, scoring highest in the dimensions “Smart Components,” “Learner Support,” and “Technical Support.” 2) On average, the dimensions with the lowest scores were “Smart Components,” “Learner Support,” and “Technical Support.” OEP developers should consider a new information architecture with metadata for demarcations that require new data sets for greater long-term scalability.

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Next-Gen Information Architecture: Open STEAM Platforms

  • 会议论文

  • 发表日期：

    2025年

查看全文
  • Laura Icela González-Pérez,
  • Juan Enciso-González,
  • Carles Lindín,
  • Marina Vicario,
  • María Soledad Ramírez-Montoya

摘要

Smart technologies in educational platforms need a new vision to organize attributes and characteristics that facilitate search and retrieval. This study reports the evaluation results of Open Educational Platforms (OEPs) in Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts, and Mathematics (STEAM). In a webinar, participants selected OEPs using a structured instrument provided during the session. The instrument includes a two-section rubric. The first section validates the obligatory metadata and adherence to an open license. The second quantitatively assesses the quality of the OEPs in seven dimensions. The questions guiding this research were: Which OEPs in STEAM aligned with the principles of open education scored the highest quality assessment, and in which dimensions? Which dimensions obtained the lowest means? 1) The highest-scoring STEAM OEPs were Khan Academy and GeoGebra, scoring highest in the dimensions “Smart Components,” “Learner Support,” and “Technical Support.” 2) On average, the dimensions with the lowest scores were “Smart Components,” “Learner Support,” and “Technical Support.” OEP developers should consider a new information architecture with metadata for demarcations that require new data sets for greater long-term scalability.