This study addresses the escalating importance of adaptive reuse in global built heritage preservation, driven by the perceived economic, cultural, and social benefits for urban communities. However, striking a delicate balance between heritage preservation and contemporary needs presents a formidable challenge, underscoring the imperative for robust evaluation methodologies in this domain. Despite growing acknowledgment of the significance of adaptive reuse, research efforts directed towards evaluating such initiatives remain relatively limited. At the heart of this paper lies an exploration of conceptual frameworks, techniques, and evaluation strategies adapted for assessing the adaptive reuse of architectural heritage. Specifically, the study scrutinizes the effectiveness of mixed methodologies in gauging the success and impact of adaptive reuse projects. The methodology employed entails a thorough review of existing literature on the subject matter. Through meticulous analysis, the paper delves into discussions, comparisons, and evaluations of various research methodologies utilized in assessing adaptive reuse initiatives. The results gleaned from this investigation encompass the identification and examination of mixed methodologies spotlighting their positive contributions to evaluating the adaptive reuse of architectural heritage. These findings are crucial for guiding future research and practical applications in architectural heritage preservation. By elucidating effective evaluation methods, the paper contributes to robust frameworks, aiding the assessment of adaptive reuse projects and fostering informed decision-making for sustainable urban development.