From the beginning of the twenty-first century, the investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) was undergoing legitimacy crisis. Both developing and developed countries took measures to reform ISDS by limiting or even abandoning ISDS at their domestic level or treaty practice. On the part of developing countries, many of them revert to traditional and conservative attitudes toward ISDS. On the part of developed countries, they modify some of the ISDS rules or create new rules. These new developments reflect that certain kind of emerging consensus is being reached between developing and developed countries.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

The Investor-State Dispute Settlement Mechanism: New Developments in the Early Twenty-First Century

  • Huiping Chen

摘要

From the beginning of the twenty-first century, the investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) was undergoing legitimacy crisis. Both developing and developed countries took measures to reform ISDS by limiting or even abandoning ISDS at their domestic level or treaty practice. On the part of developing countries, many of them revert to traditional and conservative attitudes toward ISDS. On the part of developed countries, they modify some of the ISDS rules or create new rules. These new developments reflect that certain kind of emerging consensus is being reached between developing and developed countries.