Scholarlink

For a long term, the basic attributes of IPRs have not received sufficient academic attentions in China: major IPRs textbooks and other related works of the 1980s defined IPRs as ‘one right with two attributes’: that of property right and that of personal right. In contrast, starting from the 1990s’, IPRs were differentiated in theory and practice from property rights, and qualitative analysis of intangible property rights were made from the perspective of civil law rights. It can be observed that an evolving understanding of the private rights attribute of IPRs has been achieved in China over the past decades.

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

International IPRs Conventions: Private Rights and Human Rights

  • 章节

  • 发表日期：

    2025年

查看全文
  • Handong Wu

摘要

For a long term, the basic attributes of IPRs have not received sufficient academic attentions in China: major IPRs textbooks and other related works of the 1980s defined IPRs as ‘one right with two attributes’: that of property right and that of personal right. In contrast, starting from the 1990s’, IPRs were differentiated in theory and practice from property rights, and qualitative analysis of intangible property rights were made from the perspective of civil law rights. It can be observed that an evolving understanding of the private rights attribute of IPRs has been achieved in China over the past decades.