Scholarlink

In the context within and beyond China, the ‘codification of IPRs laws’ implies two parallel approaches: one incorporates IPRs laws with the civil law—that is, making institutional arrangements for IPRs in civil code; the other restructures rules and regulations on IPRs laws—that is, drafting a corpus of law relative to IPRs in parallel with the civil code. With their respective merits and demerits, to choose either of the two requires evaluation, integration and restructuring of China’s IPRs laws, which would, in the long run, remodel China’s IPRs regime.

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

The Codification of IPRs Legislation: The Vision and Decision of China

  • 章节

  • 发表日期：

    2025年

查看全文
  • Handong Wu

摘要

In the context within and beyond China, the ‘codification of IPRs laws’ implies two parallel approaches: one incorporates IPRs laws with the civil law—that is, making institutional arrangements for IPRs in civil code; the other restructures rules and regulations on IPRs laws—that is, drafting a corpus of law relative to IPRs in parallel with the civil code. With their respective merits and demerits, to choose either of the two requires evaluation, integration and restructuring of China’s IPRs laws, which would, in the long run, remodel China’s IPRs regime.