Coverage path planning (CPP) is a critical task in various fields of mobile robots, including agricultural autonomous vehicles, lawnmowers, demining robots, planetary exploration rovers, milling operations, and many other applications. This paper studies Benson’s method (BM) a preference-based multi-objective optimization (PBMO) CPP of a mobile robot in a rectilinear simulation environment with uneven terrain. The primary objective of the paper is to minimize the energy consumption of the mobile due to: (1) the distance traveled by the robot, (2) the total elevation (ascend and descend) made by the robot, and (3) the total number of turns to complete the task of CPP in uneven terrain. Two simulation environments are selected to validate the proposed method (BM) and compare it with the weighted sum method (WSM). The proposed method overpowered the WSM in total energy consumption by 3.66% and 5.75% in the first and second environments, respectively.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

A Classical Multi-objective Approach for Coverage Path Plans for a Mobile Robot in an Uneven Terrain

  • Monex Sharma,
  • Hari Kumar Voruganti

摘要

Coverage path planning (CPP) is a critical task in various fields of mobile robots, including agricultural autonomous vehicles, lawnmowers, demining robots, planetary exploration rovers, milling operations, and many other applications. This paper studies Benson’s method (BM) a preference-based multi-objective optimization (PBMO) CPP of a mobile robot in a rectilinear simulation environment with uneven terrain. The primary objective of the paper is to minimize the energy consumption of the mobile due to: (1) the distance traveled by the robot, (2) the total elevation (ascend and descend) made by the robot, and (3) the total number of turns to complete the task of CPP in uneven terrain. Two simulation environments are selected to validate the proposed method (BM) and compare it with the weighted sum method (WSM). The proposed method overpowered the WSM in total energy consumption by 3.66% and 5.75% in the first and second environments, respectively.