The previous chapter has shown that human legal and regulatory regimes in relation to the environment have been profoundly influenced by the emergence of ecological thought over the past decades, leading to a wide range of constitutional, statutory, judicial and political provisions and initiatives that challenge the anthropocentric worldview that underpins the current environmental predicament. However, while different theoretical standpoints and distinct initiatives display different ontological and axiological premises, no actual constitutional, legislated, judicial, or even civil society-driven initiative has rejected an anthropocentric worldview in toto.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Relationality, Reciprocity and Responsibility

  • Alessandro Pelizzon

摘要

The previous chapter has shown that human legal and regulatory regimes in relation to the environment have been profoundly influenced by the emergence of ecological thought over the past decades, leading to a wide range of constitutional, statutory, judicial and political provisions and initiatives that challenge the anthropocentric worldview that underpins the current environmental predicament. However, while different theoretical standpoints and distinct initiatives display different ontological and axiological premises, no actual constitutional, legislated, judicial, or even civil society-driven initiative has rejected an anthropocentric worldview in toto.