This chapter presents reflections on a research study examining authenticity among young adults within the Indian sociocultural context. Authenticity is closely linked with well-being and positive mental health, whereas inauthenticity has been associated with negative affect and psychopathology. A comprehensive review of the literature revealed that the concept of authenticity has been defined and applied differently across domains and cultural settings. For the purposes of this study, it was conceptualized as the expression of one’s true thoughts and values in both thinking and behavior. The research commenced during the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic in 2022. Movement restrictions posed significant challenges to data collection, and the limited literature on authenticity in the Indian sociocultural context further constrained the development of an appropriate methodological framework. To address these challenges, a mixed-methods approach was used. The standardized questionnaires were shared via Google Forms, and qualitative interviews were conducted through voice calls. Methodological challenges included selecting appropriate tools, developing culturally relevant interview questions, and navigating language barriers. A visual methodology was incorporated to enrich participant engagement. The interview questions were framed to elicit understanding about challenges and contextual factors influencing authenticity. Drawing on McAdams’ life-story interview technique developed in 1996, participants were also asked to reflect on their “most me” and “least me” experiences. The chapter discusses how various challenges encountered during data collection were addressed, offers reflections from the researcher, and provides recommendations for future studies.