Scholarlink

This concluding chapter synthesizes the evolution of third-party litigation funding (TPLF) from its medieval roots in champerty and maintenance to its modern role as a regulated instrument of access to justice. It reflects on how legal traditions—common law restraint and civil law pragmatism—have gradually converged toward acceptance under structured oversight. By highlighting the balance between financial innovation and judicial integrity, the chapter argues that well-regulated TPLF not only democratizes litigation but also reframes access to justice as a shared responsibility between law, market, and society.

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Conclusion: Reframing Access to Justice Through Regulated Funding

  • 章节

  • 发表日期：

    2026年

查看全文
  • Narong Kiettikunwong

摘要

This concluding chapter synthesizes the evolution of third-party litigation funding (TPLF) from its medieval roots in champerty and maintenance to its modern role as a regulated instrument of access to justice. It reflects on how legal traditions—common law restraint and civil law pragmatism—have gradually converged toward acceptance under structured oversight. By highlighting the balance between financial innovation and judicial integrity, the chapter argues that well-regulated TPLF not only democratizes litigation but also reframes access to justice as a shared responsibility between law, market, and society.