The movement of capital is regulated by its nature. During the ten more years from the outbreak of the war, there were no obvious reasons to state that the nature of Chinese capital was fundamentally changed amidst the turbulence of the war. The representation of the Chinese economy underwent significant changes during wartime and in the post-war period, resulting in the emergence of distinctive characteristics within Chinese capital activities. However, just as all changes are centered around the fundamental nature, although a number of unprecedented new factors, such as wartime economy, state-operated enterprises, materials from enemy and puppet regimes, foreign loans and large-scale relief goods, etc., were added to the capital movement in the past ten-odd years, they in fact confusingly complicated the original capital movement to some extent and in some cases. When observing internally, it is not hard to identify that they in essence continued and reinforced the existing capital movement. This will be illustrated in the following notable aspects in brief.