Peking University Founder Company and the Red Chamber Research Institute discovered that Beijing Gaoshu Tianli Technology Co., Ltd. and Beijing Gaoshu Technology Co., Ltd. had copied and sold their copyrighted software, including Founder RIP, the Founder font library, and Fang Zhengwen software. In response, they commissioned employees of their subsidiaries to engage in transactions with the infringing companies under the guise of ordinary consumers. Evidence was collected through notarized purchases in coordination with notaries, after which the plaintiffs filed a lawsuit for copyright infringement. In the first instance, the Beijing First Intermediate People’s Court affirmed the legitimacy of this so-called “trap evidence collection” method, holding that it was not prohibited by law and should be admissible.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Theoretical Basis of Evidence Law

  • Hua Guo

摘要

Peking University Founder Company and the Red Chamber Research Institute discovered that Beijing Gaoshu Tianli Technology Co., Ltd. and Beijing Gaoshu Technology Co., Ltd. had copied and sold their copyrighted software, including Founder RIP, the Founder font library, and Fang Zhengwen software. In response, they commissioned employees of their subsidiaries to engage in transactions with the infringing companies under the guise of ordinary consumers. Evidence was collected through notarized purchases in coordination with notaries, after which the plaintiffs filed a lawsuit for copyright infringement. In the first instance, the Beijing First Intermediate People’s Court affirmed the legitimacy of this so-called “trap evidence collection” method, holding that it was not prohibited by law and should be admissible.