As key players in the global digital arena, India and the European Union reflect contrasting yet complementary approaches to Internet governance, which are shaped by their distinct socio-political contexts, regulatory philosophies, and technological ecosystems. Driven by a strong commitment to individual privacy, data protection, and human rights, Brussels has established itself as a global leader in normative frameworks, particularly through the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), the Digital Services Act, the Digital Markets Act, and the Artificial Intelligence Act. India, in contrast, represents a rapidly digitalizing democracy with a multifaceted approach to Internet governance. New Delhi’s strategy is defined by the dual objectives of promoting digital inclusion through extensive digital public infrastructure and protecting national interests via data localization policies. India also utilizes diplomatic initiatives (e.g. the India Stack) to assert its influence in global data politics. The chapter explores the strategic positioning of both India and the European Union within global data governance frameworks and the broader discourse on digital sovereignty. In conclusion, the author assesses the elements of convergence and divergence in their Internet governance strategies and the implications for global internet governance norms as well as the potential for collaboration/conflict between the two entities.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

India, the European Union, and Internet Governance

  • Aakansha Natani

摘要

As key players in the global digital arena, India and the European Union reflect contrasting yet complementary approaches to Internet governance, which are shaped by their distinct socio-political contexts, regulatory philosophies, and technological ecosystems. Driven by a strong commitment to individual privacy, data protection, and human rights, Brussels has established itself as a global leader in normative frameworks, particularly through the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), the Digital Services Act, the Digital Markets Act, and the Artificial Intelligence Act. India, in contrast, represents a rapidly digitalizing democracy with a multifaceted approach to Internet governance. New Delhi’s strategy is defined by the dual objectives of promoting digital inclusion through extensive digital public infrastructure and protecting national interests via data localization policies. India also utilizes diplomatic initiatives (e.g. the India Stack) to assert its influence in global data politics. The chapter explores the strategic positioning of both India and the European Union within global data governance frameworks and the broader discourse on digital sovereignty. In conclusion, the author assesses the elements of convergence and divergence in their Internet governance strategies and the implications for global internet governance norms as well as the potential for collaboration/conflict between the two entities.