This chapter reviews the findings and discussions explored in the previous chapters to support the main argument of this book, namely that AI-generated worksAI-generated worksrequire protectionProtection because human contributors are involved in their production. However, copyrightCopyright as it stands cannot protect them because they fail to meet both the authorshipAuthorshipand creativityCreativity requirement. Additionally, the sui generis right right, such as the EU database rightDatabase right, lacks universal applicability for protecting AI-generated works. Therefore, this book proposes a construction of a new type of neighbouring right to accommodate AI-generated works for two reasons: first, neighbouring rightsNeighbouring rights protect investment rather than an authorial contribution, and second, they are universally applicable.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Regulatory Options to Accommodate AI-generated Works

  • Laurensia Andrini

摘要

This chapter reviews the findings and discussions explored in the previous chapters to support the main argument of this book, namely that AI-generated worksAI-generated worksrequire protectionProtection because human contributors are involved in their production. However, copyrightCopyright as it stands cannot protect them because they fail to meet both the authorshipAuthorshipand creativityCreativity requirement. Additionally, the sui generis right right, such as the EU database rightDatabase right, lacks universal applicability for protecting AI-generated works. Therefore, this book proposes a construction of a new type of neighbouring right to accommodate AI-generated works for two reasons: first, neighbouring rightsNeighbouring rights protect investment rather than an authorial contribution, and second, they are universally applicable.