Scholarlink

In contrast to the assessment of novelty, the evaluation of inventive step is not straightforward. For the justificationproof of novelty, the statement: “The features XY of the main claim are not disclosed in the prior art” is generally sufficient. No further argumentation is required. Justifying inventive step is considerably more complex and demands appropriate and suitable reasoning.

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Practical Examples

  • 章节

  • 发表日期：

    2025年

查看全文
  • Thomas Heinz Meitinger

摘要

In contrast to the assessment of novelty, the evaluation of inventive step is not straightforward. For the justificationproof of novelty, the statement: “The features XY of the main claim are not disclosed in the prior art” is generally sufficient. No further argumentation is required. Justifying inventive step is considerably more complex and demands appropriate and suitable reasoning.