Part I highlighted the Indecency Problem of the Argument of Supererogation. Part II debated different positions regarding the Paradox of Supererogation and resolved the problem of whether supererogations can exist within the framework of a Strong Rationalist Supererogationism with a Virtue-Ethical Outlook (see Sect. 7.5). Part III unfolded this supererogationism and solved the Indecency Problem. This final Chap. 12 l briefly outlines the potential of my supererogationism for solving the Paradox of Apology (see Sect. 12.1), the Chopra Paradox (see Sect. 12.2), the Intransitiviy Problem (see Sect. 12.3), the Irrationality Problem (see Sect. 12.4), the Heroism Paradox (see Sect. 12.5) and the All or Nothing Paradox (see Sect. 12.6). Finally, I will address some further issues (see Sect. 12.7) which may be debated in future papers.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Solutions and Outlooks

  • Marie-Luise Raters

摘要

Part I highlighted the Indecency Problem of the Argument of Supererogation. Part II debated different positions regarding the Paradox of Supererogation and resolved the problem of whether supererogations can exist within the framework of a Strong Rationalist Supererogationism with a Virtue-Ethical Outlook (see Sect. 7.5). Part III unfolded this supererogationism and solved the Indecency Problem. This final Chap. 12 l briefly outlines the potential of my supererogationism for solving the Paradox of Apology (see Sect. 12.1), the Chopra Paradox (see Sect. 12.2), the Intransitiviy Problem (see Sect. 12.3), the Irrationality Problem (see Sect. 12.4), the Heroism Paradox (see Sect. 12.5) and the All or Nothing Paradox (see Sect. 12.6). Finally, I will address some further issues (see Sect. 12.7) which may be debated in future papers.