To frame the genesis of instruments to capture the digital competence of pre-service teachers and, in particular, instruments which involve reasoning for or against digital technology (dTs) and the facet of “selecting digital learning materials”, we first provide the conventions used to describe “digital resources” in education. Further, we examine two definitions of “competence” in educational research, one by Blömeke et al. (2015), and another by Weinert (1999). Additionally, we decompose the “digital competence” of (pre-service) teachers using the DigCompEdu framework and a localized German Delphi study defining the digital competence of pre-service teachers from the perspective of STEM teacher educators.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Theoretical Frame

  • Peter Manfred Gonscherowski

摘要

To frame the genesis of instruments to capture the digital competence of pre-service teachers and, in particular, instruments which involve reasoning for or against digital technology (dTs) and the facet of “selecting digital learning materials”, we first provide the conventions used to describe “digital resources” in education. Further, we examine two definitions of “competence” in educational research, one by Blömeke et al. (2015), and another by Weinert (1999). Additionally, we decompose the “digital competence” of (pre-service) teachers using the DigCompEdu framework and a localized German Delphi study defining the digital competence of pre-service teachers from the perspective of STEM teacher educators.