Scholarlink

The current societal relationship to animals is characterized—like hardly any other topic—by self-evident assumptions (e.g., using animals) and contradictions (e.g., loving dogs and eating pigs, cf. Joy 2013), which contain power structures (cf. among others Kompatscher et al. 2021, p. 31). Although aspects of power and domination are addressed in the discourse on citizenship education and power structures are made visible and reflected upon as such, the discourse—except for a few instances (cf. among others Bloise 2021, 2023b; Juchler 2022a)—often overlooks the fact that the human-animal relationship is also permeated by power structures that cause suffering. Therefore, the overarching aim of this work is to establish the human-animal relationship as an explicit subject for citizenship education.

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Introduction

  • 章节

  • 发表日期：

    2025年

查看全文
  • Jennifer Bloise

摘要

The current societal relationship to animals is characterized—like hardly any other topic—by self-evident assumptions (e.g., using animals) and contradictions (e.g., loving dogs and eating pigs, cf. Joy 2013), which contain power structures (cf. among others Kompatscher et al. 2021, p. 31). Although aspects of power and domination are addressed in the discourse on citizenship education and power structures are made visible and reflected upon as such, the discourse—except for a few instances (cf. among others Bloise 2021, 2023b; Juchler 2022a)—often overlooks the fact that the human-animal relationship is also permeated by power structures that cause suffering. Therefore, the overarching aim of this work is to establish the human-animal relationship as an explicit subject for citizenship education.