SEAndroid is deployed on almost all modern Android devices to enforce mandatory access control. The Android Open Source Project regularly publishes a predefined SEAndroid policy that each vendor customises for its devices. These customisations and policy updates may cause security regressions: even small misconfigurations may introduce new information flows leading to exploitable vulnerabilities. We propose a differential verification framework that determines whether security-relevant changes between two SEAndroid configurations affect information-flow properties as intended. Our verification framework is based on the novel comparative modal logic \( {\text {CML}} \) interpreted over pairs of Kripke structures. We formalise SEAndroid policies within this logic and define a suitable model-checking algorithm for differential reasoning. We implement our framework in the tool Mordente, and evaluate it on real-world SEAndroid policies.