Precedent is the first factor in the Second Chances Framework, providing a temporal dimension to decisions about granting second chances after ethical missteps. It links present choices to both the past, by examining paradigmatic cases that may constrain or guide current reasoning, and to the future, by establishing standards for how similar cases should be treated. The chapter situates precedent within traditions of legal and moral reasoning, particularly casuistry, where analogies to past cases inform judgments. Unlike purely deductive approaches based on abstract principles, casuistry emphasizes practical reasoning through case comparison, consistent with Aristotle’s view of ethical wisdom as grounded in experience. The chapter illustrates precedent with a compliance case from the pharmaceutical industry, where a senior employee breached rules by gifting football tickets to a doctor. The compliance leader’s decision about whether to discipline or retain her highlights how precedent shapes organizational consistency, predictability, and fairness. Classroom reflections reveal that decisions about second chances often involve habitual misconduct rather than isolated lapses, reinforcing the need for timely and principled responses. Ultimately, precedent provides decision-makers with a framework to balance organizational history, future expectations, and ethical consistency.