Critical ethical challenges, such as data privacy, algorithmic governance, and equitable access, are increasingly relevant in a digital world where sensitive personal or community data are collected centrally or stored in the cloud. This study presents a comparative analysis of Centralized Learning and Federated Learning for privacy-preserving machine learning, using healthcare sleep disorder detection as a case study. The methodology employs ballistocardiography (BCG) signals acquired via non-invasive sensors, illustrating a replicable workflow for distributed, privacy-preserving analysis. Both approaches are evaluated using Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) to assess accuracy, privacy preservation, and computational efficiency. Experimental results show that the federated model achieves 77.98% testing accuracy, slightly surpassing the centralized model (75.71%), with only 18.27 s per training round and 2.91 s for testing, demonstrating fast convergence and competitive performance while preserving data privacy.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Enabling Privacy-Preserving Digital Well-Being Through Federated Learning

  • Pietro Fusco,
  • Palma Errico,
  • Domenico di Sivo,
  • Salvatore Venticinque

摘要

Critical ethical challenges, such as data privacy, algorithmic governance, and equitable access, are increasingly relevant in a digital world where sensitive personal or community data are collected centrally or stored in the cloud. This study presents a comparative analysis of Centralized Learning and Federated Learning for privacy-preserving machine learning, using healthcare sleep disorder detection as a case study. The methodology employs ballistocardiography (BCG) signals acquired via non-invasive sensors, illustrating a replicable workflow for distributed, privacy-preserving analysis. Both approaches are evaluated using Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) to assess accuracy, privacy preservation, and computational efficiency. Experimental results show that the federated model achieves 77.98% testing accuracy, slightly surpassing the centralized model (75.71%), with only 18.27 s per training round and 2.91 s for testing, demonstrating fast convergence and competitive performance while preserving data privacy.