Scholarlink

As discussed, Chap. 2 of this book serves as the core chapter, illustrating how NCPs elaborate on corporate responsibilities for human rights and environmental due diligence in alignment with the international BHR framework. However, the analysis of OECD case law reveals that human rights risks are diverse and often context-specific, involving different vulnerable groups, unique situations, and distinct concepts. This diversity in risk profiles indicates that a one-size-fits-all approach to HRDD is insufficient. Instead, corporate HRDD practices need to be tailored and customised to effectively address the specific risks associated with each company’s actions and operating environment. The findings from the OECD case law highlighted that for HRDD to be truly effective, it must be responsive to the particular vulnerabilities and contextual factors that arise in different cases. For instance, risks related to workers’ rights, Indigenous People’s rights, or environmental impacts may require distinct approaches, given their unique implications for different groups and settings.

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Clarifying Corporate Human Rights Responsibilities in Specific Contexts Through OECD Case Law

  • 章节

  • 发表日期：

    2026年

查看全文
  • Otgontuya Davaanyam

摘要

As discussed, Chap. 2 of this book serves as the core chapter, illustrating how NCPs elaborate on corporate responsibilities for human rights and environmental due diligence in alignment with the international BHR framework. However, the analysis of OECD case law reveals that human rights risks are diverse and often context-specific, involving different vulnerable groups, unique situations, and distinct concepts. This diversity in risk profiles indicates that a one-size-fits-all approach to HRDD is insufficient. Instead, corporate HRDD practices need to be tailored and customised to effectively address the specific risks associated with each company’s actions and operating environment. The findings from the OECD case law highlighted that for HRDD to be truly effective, it must be responsive to the particular vulnerabilities and contextual factors that arise in different cases. For instance, risks related to workers’ rights, Indigenous People’s rights, or environmental impacts may require distinct approaches, given their unique implications for different groups and settings.