Fog and haze degrade image quality by scattering light, reducing contrast, and obscuring critical details in applications like autonomous driving and surveillance. This comprehensive survey examines research works on foggy image enhancement, systematically categorizing methods into traditional physics-based approaches (e.g., Retinex, Dark Channel Prior), learning-based techniques (e.g., GANs), and hybrid fusion strategies (e.g., LiDAR-RGB). Traditional methods like variable-filter Retinex and wavelet-YUV decomposition achieve real-time processing (125 ms) but struggle with dense fog and color distortion. Learning-based approaches, such as CycleGAN and physics-guided models, improve generalization and achieve superior quality (PSNR = 28.5 dB) but require significant computational resources (3.09 s processing time). Hybrid techniques combine sensor data with image processing, achieving excellent structural preservation (SSIM = 0.88) but face hardware complexity constraints. Performance analysis reveals fundamental trade-offs between speed, quality, and deployment complexity. Key unresolved challenges include extreme fog handling, real-time edge deployment, and cost-effective multi-modal fusion.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Imaging Under Foggy Conditions: A Comprehensive Survey of Enhancement Techniques

  • Hit Rachhadiya,
  • Tapan Nahar,
  • Chandrasinh Parmar

摘要

Fog and haze degrade image quality by scattering light, reducing contrast, and obscuring critical details in applications like autonomous driving and surveillance. This comprehensive survey examines research works on foggy image enhancement, systematically categorizing methods into traditional physics-based approaches (e.g., Retinex, Dark Channel Prior), learning-based techniques (e.g., GANs), and hybrid fusion strategies (e.g., LiDAR-RGB). Traditional methods like variable-filter Retinex and wavelet-YUV decomposition achieve real-time processing (125 ms) but struggle with dense fog and color distortion. Learning-based approaches, such as CycleGAN and physics-guided models, improve generalization and achieve superior quality (PSNR = 28.5 dB) but require significant computational resources (3.09 s processing time). Hybrid techniques combine sensor data with image processing, achieving excellent structural preservation (SSIM = 0.88) but face hardware complexity constraints. Performance analysis reveals fundamental trade-offs between speed, quality, and deployment complexity. Key unresolved challenges include extreme fog handling, real-time edge deployment, and cost-effective multi-modal fusion.