Chapter 3 examines how early Irish-Argentine writers constructed narratives of belonging through moral, religious, and spatial frameworks that reflected both integration and ambivalence within Argentine society. Focusing on works by William Bulfin and Kathleen Nevin, the chapter traces how Catholicism, rural life, and pastoral ideals shaped the community’s self-representation during the consolidation of the Argentine nation-state. These texts articulate a form of cultural mediation, translating Irish moral values into the language of Argentine nationalism while negotiating tensions between faith, progress, and modernity. Drawing on concepts of moral geography and imagined community, the chapter explores how literature operated as a vehicle of social cohesion and cultural authority. Yet beneath the rhetoric of assimilation lies a subtle awareness of displacement and loss, revealing how moral discourse became a means to stabilise identity in the face of cultural hybridity. Through this interplay of devotion and dislocation, Bulfin and Nevin’s writings anticipate later Irish-Argentine expressions of hybridity and nostalgia, linking the early diasporic imagination to broader debates about national belonging and ethical modernity explored in subsequent chapters.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Gauchos, Immigrants, and Argentine Society in Irish Writing

  • María Luján Medina

摘要

Chapter 3 examines how early Irish-Argentine writers constructed narratives of belonging through moral, religious, and spatial frameworks that reflected both integration and ambivalence within Argentine society. Focusing on works by William Bulfin and Kathleen Nevin, the chapter traces how Catholicism, rural life, and pastoral ideals shaped the community’s self-representation during the consolidation of the Argentine nation-state. These texts articulate a form of cultural mediation, translating Irish moral values into the language of Argentine nationalism while negotiating tensions between faith, progress, and modernity. Drawing on concepts of moral geography and imagined community, the chapter explores how literature operated as a vehicle of social cohesion and cultural authority. Yet beneath the rhetoric of assimilation lies a subtle awareness of displacement and loss, revealing how moral discourse became a means to stabilise identity in the face of cultural hybridity. Through this interplay of devotion and dislocation, Bulfin and Nevin’s writings anticipate later Irish-Argentine expressions of hybridity and nostalgia, linking the early diasporic imagination to broader debates about national belonging and ethical modernity explored in subsequent chapters.