While current research on AI-generated content detection predominantly focuses on algorithmic solutions, limited attention has been given to end-users’ ability to discern AI-generated from human-produced material. This study investigates Polish undergraduate students’ self-assessed AI literacy, specifically their perceived ability to recognize AI-generated text, images, and videos. A quantitative survey (n = 350) comprising 32 Likert-scale items examined students’ engagement with AI tools, exposure to AI-generated media, perceived recognition capabilities, and online information evaluation practices. Over 80% reported encounters with AI-generated content and over 70% expressed confidence in identifying AI-generated videos. Nonetheless, the infrequent use of verification tools indicates potential overestimation of their competencies. This discrepancy may reflect cognitive biases, as existing literature underscores the difficulty of such distinctions. A majority of participants supported mandatory labeling of AI-generated content. These findings highlight a critical need for empirical validation of users’ detection abilities and underscore the importance of developing robust AI literacy frameworks.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Self-Assessment of the Polish Students’ Artificial Intelligence (AI) Literacy in the Context of AI-Generated Content Detection

  • Paulina Motylińska,
  • Anna Pieczka-Węgorkiewicz

摘要

While current research on AI-generated content detection predominantly focuses on algorithmic solutions, limited attention has been given to end-users’ ability to discern AI-generated from human-produced material. This study investigates Polish undergraduate students’ self-assessed AI literacy, specifically their perceived ability to recognize AI-generated text, images, and videos. A quantitative survey (n = 350) comprising 32 Likert-scale items examined students’ engagement with AI tools, exposure to AI-generated media, perceived recognition capabilities, and online information evaluation practices. Over 80% reported encounters with AI-generated content and over 70% expressed confidence in identifying AI-generated videos. Nonetheless, the infrequent use of verification tools indicates potential overestimation of their competencies. This discrepancy may reflect cognitive biases, as existing literature underscores the difficulty of such distinctions. A majority of participants supported mandatory labeling of AI-generated content. These findings highlight a critical need for empirical validation of users’ detection abilities and underscore the importance of developing robust AI literacy frameworks.