Scholarlink

Mass surveillance is expanding rapidly, with some regions expected to generate 800 terabytes of data annually, escalating concerns over human rights. This study investigates the complex relationship between state surveillance practices and privacy protections, aiming to identify key factors that influence the security-privacy equilibrium. Utilizing a multi-method approach that combines legal doctrinal analysis, comparative legal studies, and empirical data evaluation from over 50 surveillance programs and 200 legal documents, this research assesses the impact of legal oversight, public awareness, and technological measures on privacy outcomes. Our findings reveal a strong correlation between robust, independent oversight mechanisms and a reduction in privacy violations; countries with strong oversight report 30% fewer violations and amend privacy laws twice as fast. Conversely, laissez-faire regulatory approaches are associated with a higher surveillance-to-privacy ratio. Statistical modeling further confirms that each unit increase in oversight strength corresponds to a significant reduction in reported privacy violations. The study concludes that a combination of strong legal frameworks, enhanced public awareness, and international cooperation is essential to safeguard human rights in the digital age, advocating for a future where privacy protections are not merely fundamental but actively prioritized.

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Mass Surveillance and Human Rights: Legal Challenges in the Digital Era

  • 会议论文

  • 发表日期：

    2026年

查看全文
  • Nibras Aref Abdalameer,
  • Sundus Serhan Ahmed,
  • Israa Zaidan Khalaf Mashhoot,
  • Bushra Salman Husein,
  • Ahmed Sabah,
  • Dmytro Chornomordenko

摘要

Mass surveillance is expanding rapidly, with some regions expected to generate 800 terabytes of data annually, escalating concerns over human rights. This study investigates the complex relationship between state surveillance practices and privacy protections, aiming to identify key factors that influence the security-privacy equilibrium. Utilizing a multi-method approach that combines legal doctrinal analysis, comparative legal studies, and empirical data evaluation from over 50 surveillance programs and 200 legal documents, this research assesses the impact of legal oversight, public awareness, and technological measures on privacy outcomes. Our findings reveal a strong correlation between robust, independent oversight mechanisms and a reduction in privacy violations; countries with strong oversight report 30% fewer violations and amend privacy laws twice as fast. Conversely, laissez-faire regulatory approaches are associated with a higher surveillance-to-privacy ratio. Statistical modeling further confirms that each unit increase in oversight strength corresponds to a significant reduction in reported privacy violations. The study concludes that a combination of strong legal frameworks, enhanced public awareness, and international cooperation is essential to safeguard human rights in the digital age, advocating for a future where privacy protections are not merely fundamental but actively prioritized.