The legal security of persons’ status is greatly affected by the withdrawal of an administrative decision which constitutes a grave risk to their established rights. For this reason, it is indispensable that this administrative action be placed under a legal regime aimed at preventing possible abuses of authority by the administration and, consequently, fostering trust among those dealing with public administration. To that effect, the present research shall attempt to determine the legal regime concerning the withdrawal of administrative decisions. The first part explains what it means to take back an administrative choice. The next part looks into the rules and ideas that shape this action, paying attention to the steps that control how a choice is taken back. Our research finds some key points. One, the way a choice is taken back depends on a legal side, which is set by the law-makers, and a personal side linked to the admin that makes the choice. Also, the study gives many tips, with the biggest being to lessen free choice in mixed picks to stop wrong use of power by the admin; this is more needed now as digital tools and AI are used in making choices. This might aid in making the process smoother and ensure clearer and answerable admin steps.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

The Legal Framework for the Withdrawal of Administrative Decisions in the Age of Digitalization

  • Abdulaziz Al-khawatreh,
  • Mohammed Faris Al-Atin

摘要

The legal security of persons’ status is greatly affected by the withdrawal of an administrative decision which constitutes a grave risk to their established rights. For this reason, it is indispensable that this administrative action be placed under a legal regime aimed at preventing possible abuses of authority by the administration and, consequently, fostering trust among those dealing with public administration. To that effect, the present research shall attempt to determine the legal regime concerning the withdrawal of administrative decisions. The first part explains what it means to take back an administrative choice. The next part looks into the rules and ideas that shape this action, paying attention to the steps that control how a choice is taken back. Our research finds some key points. One, the way a choice is taken back depends on a legal side, which is set by the law-makers, and a personal side linked to the admin that makes the choice. Also, the study gives many tips, with the biggest being to lessen free choice in mixed picks to stop wrong use of power by the admin; this is more needed now as digital tools and AI are used in making choices. This might aid in making the process smoother and ensure clearer and answerable admin steps.