In this chapter focuses on the structured processes of auditing, performance review, and continuous improvement as essential components of a robust Well Integrity Management System (WIMS). While well integrity relies on sound design, competent execution, and vigilant operations, sustaining performance over time requires periodic evaluation of whether systems, practices, and barriers are functioning as intended. This chapter introduces the concept of integrity assurance as a dynamic, iterative process grounded in evidence-based assessment and organizational learning. The chapter outlines the objectives, methodologies, and types of well integrity audits, distinguishing between internal and external audits, and between system-level audits (e.g., WIMS compliance, barrier verification programs) and operational audits (e.g., well file reviews, surveillance records, field execution). It emphasizes that audits should not merely check for procedural compliance but should actively test the effectiveness of integrity controls in preventing failures. Effective audits identify gaps, inconsistencies, or latent risks that may not be visible during routine operations. Performance reviews are discussed as a complementary activity, integrating audit findings, KPIs, incident data, and operational observations to evaluate the overall health and maturity of the integrity program. The chapter presents structured review cycles—quarterly, annual, and post-event—and outlines tools such as integrity dashboards, bowtie analysis, and maturity models to support high-level evaluations. These reviews are crucial for prioritizing resources, identifying emerging risks, and setting strategic goals for integrity performance. The concept of continuous improvement is introduced not as a separate function, but as the output of a closed-loop integrity management cycle. This includes root cause analysis (RCA) of failures or near misses, implementation of corrective and preventative actions (CAPAs), and verification of effectiveness. Importantly, continuous improvement extends to updating procedures, training content, digital systems, and field practices based on feedback from audits, reviews, and frontline personnel. The chapter concludes by reinforcing that audits and reviews must be perceived not as punitive controls, but as opportunities for learning, improvement, and strengthening organizational resilience. A successful integrity assurance program is the one that evolves with the operating environment, adapts to new challenges, and fosters a culture of accountability, transparency, and proactive risk management.

Integrity Challenges in Harsh Environments

章节
发表日期：

2026年

查看全文

Ahmed Alsubaih,
Kamy Sepehrnoori

摘要

In this chapter focuses on the structured processes of auditing, performance review, and continuous improvement as essential components of a robust Well Integrity Management System (WIMS). While well integrity relies on sound design, competent execution, and vigilant operations, sustaining performance over time requires periodic evaluation of whether systems, practices, and barriers are functioning as intended. This chapter introduces the concept of integrity assurance as a dynamic, iterative process grounded in evidence-based assessment and organizational learning. The chapter outlines the objectives, methodologies, and types of well integrity audits, distinguishing between internal and external audits, and between system-level audits (e.g., WIMS compliance, barrier verification programs) and operational audits (e.g., well file reviews, surveillance records, field execution). It emphasizes that audits should not merely check for procedural compliance but should actively test the effectiveness of integrity controls in preventing failures. Effective audits identify gaps, inconsistencies, or latent risks that may not be visible during routine operations. Performance reviews are discussed as a complementary activity, integrating audit findings, KPIs, incident data, and operational observations to evaluate the overall health and maturity of the integrity program. The chapter presents structured review cycles—quarterly, annual, and post-event—and outlines tools such as integrity dashboards, bowtie analysis, and maturity models to support high-level evaluations. These reviews are crucial for prioritizing resources, identifying emerging risks, and setting strategic goals for integrity performance. The concept of continuous improvement is introduced not as a separate function, but as the output of a closed-loop integrity management cycle. This includes root cause analysis (RCA) of failures or near misses, implementation of corrective and preventative actions (CAPAs), and verification of effectiveness. Importantly, continuous improvement extends to updating procedures, training content, digital systems, and field practices based on feedback from audits, reviews, and frontline personnel. The chapter concludes by reinforcing that audits and reviews must be perceived not as punitive controls, but as opportunities for learning, improvement, and strengthening organizational resilience. A successful integrity assurance program is the one that evolves with the operating environment, adapts to new challenges, and fosters a culture of accountability, transparency, and proactive risk management.