This chapter focuses on the ethical dilemmas faced by long-term care staff when balancing resident safety with autonomy and quality of life. It critiques the current regulatory environment’s bias toward safety and introduces the “three-legged stool” framework as a mental model for achieving a more balanced approach. The chapter also discusses the conflated meanings of safety and the importance of recognizing risk as an inherent part of life, ultimately advocating for person-centered care that respects individual values.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Long-Term Care Facilities and the Staff’s Perspective

  • Theresa A. Harvath,
  • Mark Fedyk

摘要

This chapter focuses on the ethical dilemmas faced by long-term care staff when balancing resident safety with autonomy and quality of life. It critiques the current regulatory environment’s bias toward safety and introduces the “three-legged stool” framework as a mental model for achieving a more balanced approach. The chapter also discusses the conflated meanings of safety and the importance of recognizing risk as an inherent part of life, ultimately advocating for person-centered care that respects individual values.