Scholarlink

Prior chapters explained how scientific knowledge and practice are inherently political. This chapter is about how to intentionally bring shared values into the work of technoscience, in other words, how to do politics with scientific knowledge. When we teach the history of science, technology and medicine to undergraduates, particularly those majoring in STEM, we often receive the same reaction: “How did I not know this? Why did I not learn this in my [Biology/Neuroscience/Computer Science/Biostatistics] courses?”

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Backpocket Methodology: Seven Radical Scientific Inquiries

  • 章节

  • 发表日期：

    2026年

查看全文
  • Salvador Zárate,
  • Kalindi Vora,
  • Saiba Varma,
  • Leslie Quintanilla,
  • Christoph Hanssmann

摘要

Prior chapters explained how scientific knowledge and practice are inherently political. This chapter is about how to intentionally bring shared values into the work of technoscience, in other words, how to do politics with scientific knowledge. When we teach the history of science, technology and medicine to undergraduates, particularly those majoring in STEM, we often receive the same reaction: “How did I not know this? Why did I not learn this in my [Biology/Neuroscience/Computer Science/Biostatistics] courses?”