This paper provides an review of the pedagogical practices and governance perspectives related to technology integration in Philippine State Universities and Colleges (SUCs). The global pandemic served as a catalyst, accelerating a system-wide shift from emergency remote teaching to a strategic push for sustained flexible learning, underpinned by national policies from the Commission on Higher Education (CHED) and cross-agency collaborations. However, a significant gap persists between ambition and institutional reality. This review examines four key domains: institutional governance and leadership, pedagogical practices in the digital classroom, the human element of faculty and student experiences, and the foundational pillars of infrastructure and finance. Findings reveal a governance paradox where strategic planning is robust, but leadership needs to translate vision into faculty competency. Pedagogically, technology adoption outpaces deep integration, with tools often used to replicate traditional methods. Faculty and students are caught in a “Cycle of Unpreparedness,” marked by skill gaps, anxiety, and infrastructural barriers. Foundational weaknesses, including a pervasive digital divide and unstable funding models, create a mismatch between the vision for digital transformation and the capacity for implementation. The paper concludes with multi-level strategic recommendations for policymakers, SUC administrators, and future research, aimed at creating a more resilient, equitable, and innovative digital education ecosystem.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Harnessing Technology in Professional Education: An Inquiry into Pedagogical Practices and Governance Perspectives in State Universities and Colleges in the Philippines

  • Romary Reyes Lincod

摘要

This paper provides an review of the pedagogical practices and governance perspectives related to technology integration in Philippine State Universities and Colleges (SUCs). The global pandemic served as a catalyst, accelerating a system-wide shift from emergency remote teaching to a strategic push for sustained flexible learning, underpinned by national policies from the Commission on Higher Education (CHED) and cross-agency collaborations. However, a significant gap persists between ambition and institutional reality. This review examines four key domains: institutional governance and leadership, pedagogical practices in the digital classroom, the human element of faculty and student experiences, and the foundational pillars of infrastructure and finance. Findings reveal a governance paradox where strategic planning is robust, but leadership needs to translate vision into faculty competency. Pedagogically, technology adoption outpaces deep integration, with tools often used to replicate traditional methods. Faculty and students are caught in a “Cycle of Unpreparedness,” marked by skill gaps, anxiety, and infrastructural barriers. Foundational weaknesses, including a pervasive digital divide and unstable funding models, create a mismatch between the vision for digital transformation and the capacity for implementation. The paper concludes with multi-level strategic recommendations for policymakers, SUC administrators, and future research, aimed at creating a more resilient, equitable, and innovative digital education ecosystem.