This study analyses the impact of learning modes, frequency, and (mis)match of preferred learning strategies on two cohorts of Computer Science students. Using VARK learning strategies, Moodle access data, and grades across learning environments, our finding shows students perform best in offline settings (43.79% achieving first-class grades versus 33.64% in blended and 29.25% in online). Frequent Moodle access correlates with higher performance across all modes. Surprisingly, students with mismatched learning strategies (over 70%) outperformed those with matched strategies. This unexpected result likely stems from the disconnect between lecture-based teaching methods and CS assessments. While lectures align with visual and auditory styles, CS coursework demands kinaesthetic approaches through programming and problem-solving, suggesting adaptability may benefit CS students more than strict adherence to preferred learning styles.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

The Impact of Different Teaching Methods, Moodle Access Frequency, and (Mis)matching of Learning Strategies Towards Students’ Academic Success in Higher Education

  • Yidan Cheng,
  • Cheng Qin,
  • Runzhou Zhang,
  • Christopher Mark Roadknight,
  • Gabrielle Saputra Hadian,
  • Joseph Manuel Thenara,
  • Prapa Rattadilok

摘要

This study analyses the impact of learning modes, frequency, and (mis)match of preferred learning strategies on two cohorts of Computer Science students. Using VARK learning strategies, Moodle access data, and grades across learning environments, our finding shows students perform best in offline settings (43.79% achieving first-class grades versus 33.64% in blended and 29.25% in online). Frequent Moodle access correlates with higher performance across all modes. Surprisingly, students with mismatched learning strategies (over 70%) outperformed those with matched strategies. This unexpected result likely stems from the disconnect between lecture-based teaching methods and CS assessments. While lectures align with visual and auditory styles, CS coursework demands kinaesthetic approaches through programming and problem-solving, suggesting adaptability may benefit CS students more than strict adherence to preferred learning styles.