Scholarlink

The chapter embraces a variety of approaches to risk analysis and identification of the best ways to safeguard cultural heritage. None of the proposed methods is exhaustive but each contributes to formulating a multidisciplinary method which, as this volume repeatedly shows, the topic itself requires. The academic study that underlies each contribution does not forget applicative and operational implications, particularly in the area studied by the group: the city of L’Aquila. First of all, the case studies of the entire Spoke 7 are distinguished by types, identified according to different scales of reference. The AirTable platform, used by all Spoke Partners, becomes an opportunity for exchange and collaboration between those who, for example, operate on the same type of risk. The scale of territories and landscape is the object of analysis of aerial photogrammetry, an aid to the protection and documentation of cultural heritage, but also an important tool for urban planning and management. On a national scale, the impact of natural events on cultural heritage has been studied, resulting from the interaction between specific hazards and the intrinsic characteristics of individual artefacts, but also the communities’ capacity to absorb the impact of the event. Subsequently, we delve into the communities in a proactive approach to risk management, where we propose to collaborate with local communities in order to generate an endogenous capacity to face the risk, anticipating it, then working with awareness on prevention. The fil rouge is a constant eye on providing tools for managers of the res publica and decision makers, who can use georeferenced maps for planning, allocate resources for vulnerable communities, and use methodological frameworks to develop virtuous policies and forward-looking strategies for cultural heritage: the proposal that closes the chapter refers to the scale of the historic city, consisting of the planning and creation (in progress) of a network of expertise, cultural specialists and public administrations in the historic city of L’Aquila, to make possible shared and transversal policies—from decision makers to communities—for the care of cultural heritage, which is the identity and history of the communities that live it.

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

The Case Studies: Data Acquisition, Natural and Anthropic Risks Analysis, Network of Competences as a Tool for Preservation of the Culture Heritage

  • 章节

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年

查看全文
  • Roberto Aloisio,
  • Ilia Antenucci,
  • Maria Giovanna Brandano,
  • Elena De Panfilis,
  • Speranza Falciano,
  • Arianna Fedeli,
  • Ludovico Iovino,
  • Marco Modica,
  • Ugo Rossi,
  • Enrico Stagnini

摘要

The chapter embraces a variety of approaches to risk analysis and identification of the best ways to safeguard cultural heritage. None of the proposed methods is exhaustive but each contributes to formulating a multidisciplinary method which, as this volume repeatedly shows, the topic itself requires. The academic study that underlies each contribution does not forget applicative and operational implications, particularly in the area studied by the group: the city of L’Aquila. First of all, the case studies of the entire Spoke 7 are distinguished by types, identified according to different scales of reference. The AirTable platform, used by all Spoke Partners, becomes an opportunity for exchange and collaboration between those who, for example, operate on the same type of risk. The scale of territories and landscape is the object of analysis of aerial photogrammetry, an aid to the protection and documentation of cultural heritage, but also an important tool for urban planning and management. On a national scale, the impact of natural events on cultural heritage has been studied, resulting from the interaction between specific hazards and the intrinsic characteristics of individual artefacts, but also the communities’ capacity to absorb the impact of the event. Subsequently, we delve into the communities in a proactive approach to risk management, where we propose to collaborate with local communities in order to generate an endogenous capacity to face the risk, anticipating it, then working with awareness on prevention. The fil rouge is a constant eye on providing tools for managers of the res publica and decision makers, who can use georeferenced maps for planning, allocate resources for vulnerable communities, and use methodological frameworks to develop virtuous policies and forward-looking strategies for cultural heritage: the proposal that closes the chapter refers to the scale of the historic city, consisting of the planning and creation (in progress) of a network of expertise, cultural specialists and public administrations in the historic city of L’Aquila, to make possible shared and transversal policies—from decision makers to communities—for the care of cultural heritage, which is the identity and history of the communities that live it.