This closing chapter proposes an alternative to Eurocentric and anthropocentric cosmopolitanism and that worlding shared humanity is possible through decolonial cosmopolitan localism and radically reflexive politics. This perspective embraces a pluriverse of ways of knowing and being at the same level of importance vis-à-vis each other, including more-than-human perspectives. However, this worlding goes through healing, and such healing is what allows us to be able to embrace an ethic of love. This ethic yields a capacity for “expansiveness” that is proposed as the source of freedom for RRI who directs it towards its relationships and relations (that ideally encompasses every-body and everything) and discloses a radically relational type of freedom, different from the liberal kind, which is nonetheless congenial with liberal values and concerns.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Conclusion: Worlding Shared Humanity in a Shared World

  • Mónica J. Sánchez-Flores

摘要

This closing chapter proposes an alternative to Eurocentric and anthropocentric cosmopolitanism and that worlding shared humanity is possible through decolonial cosmopolitan localism and radically reflexive politics. This perspective embraces a pluriverse of ways of knowing and being at the same level of importance vis-à-vis each other, including more-than-human perspectives. However, this worlding goes through healing, and such healing is what allows us to be able to embrace an ethic of love. This ethic yields a capacity for “expansiveness” that is proposed as the source of freedom for RRI who directs it towards its relationships and relations (that ideally encompasses every-body and everything) and discloses a radically relational type of freedom, different from the liberal kind, which is nonetheless congenial with liberal values and concerns.