This chapter examines the limits of the state’s competence in childrearing. It argues that while the state may be justified in enforcing a baseline of adequacy, it lacks the knowledge, continuity and moral standing to mandate care beyond this level. Drawing on legal, psychological and philosophical sources, I argue that state intervention above the adequacy threshold not only exceeds its legitimate role but also often undermines the very goods it seeks to protect, including the integrity of the parent–child relationship and the value of parental judgement.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Adequate Care and the State

  • Danielle Levitan

摘要

This chapter examines the limits of the state’s competence in childrearing. It argues that while the state may be justified in enforcing a baseline of adequacy, it lacks the knowledge, continuity and moral standing to mandate care beyond this level. Drawing on legal, psychological and philosophical sources, I argue that state intervention above the adequacy threshold not only exceeds its legitimate role but also often undermines the very goods it seeks to protect, including the integrity of the parent–child relationship and the value of parental judgement.