Doctoral education presents significant challenges, often leading to high dropout rates and extended completion periods. This paper examines the case of a PhD candidate who successfully completed their doctoral studies within three years while maintaining full-time employment and without financial support from funding agencies. By considering the candidate’s and supervisors’ perspectives, this study explores the obstacles encountered and the key factors that facilitated the outcome. Findings highlight the role of structured supervision, timely and constructive feedback, academic engagement, and the ability to balance professional and research responsibilities. Additionally, the study underscores the importance of fostering autonomy and motivation through good mood and proactive and supportive supervision. The insights contribute to the broader discourse on effective research training and doctoral program design, offering practical recommendations for enhancing supervisory practices, student preparation, and institutional support systems in higher education.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Pathways to a Successful PhD Journey: A Dual Perspective from Student and Supervisory Team

  • Rúben Pinhal,
  • Ana Estima,
  • Paulo Duarte

摘要

Doctoral education presents significant challenges, often leading to high dropout rates and extended completion periods. This paper examines the case of a PhD candidate who successfully completed their doctoral studies within three years while maintaining full-time employment and without financial support from funding agencies. By considering the candidate’s and supervisors’ perspectives, this study explores the obstacles encountered and the key factors that facilitated the outcome. Findings highlight the role of structured supervision, timely and constructive feedback, academic engagement, and the ability to balance professional and research responsibilities. Additionally, the study underscores the importance of fostering autonomy and motivation through good mood and proactive and supportive supervision. The insights contribute to the broader discourse on effective research training and doctoral program design, offering practical recommendations for enhancing supervisory practices, student preparation, and institutional support systems in higher education.