This chapter comprehensively evaluates the existing consumer remedies for faulty goods under Ghanaian law, with a particular focus on whether the remedies are adequate to effectively afford consumers the required remedies when supplied with faulty goods. The analysis demonstrates that the current legal framework on consumer remedies is restricted to the rejection of faulty goods and the pursuit of damages, which is broadly inadequate for the effective safeguard of consumers with faulty goods. The chapter argues that the absence of alternative remedies is largely unhelpful for the effective protection of consumers in Ghana. The shortcomings of the remedies for faulty goods are further comparatively explored with English law and its EU experience in the next chapter of this book with the aim of identifying lessons that resonate with the specific context of Ghana.