Psychology’s diagnostic norms are politically biased. Its classifications are arbitrary and culturally contingent, leading to inconsistent application. For example, children from racial minorities are more likely to be diagnosed with conduct disorders than white children who display the same behaviours. This clinical open-endedness allows for political projection, where conditions like post-traumatic stress disorder or gender dysphoria can be dismissed as fashionable trends. Ultimately, psychology individualises suffering, thereby locating defects within people rather than within a dysfunctional society. This disproportionately marginalises out-groups and contradicts claims that the field is liberally biased.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Example #3: By Labelling Deviance

  • Brian M. Hughes

摘要

Psychology’s diagnostic norms are politically biased. Its classifications are arbitrary and culturally contingent, leading to inconsistent application. For example, children from racial minorities are more likely to be diagnosed with conduct disorders than white children who display the same behaviours. This clinical open-endedness allows for political projection, where conditions like post-traumatic stress disorder or gender dysphoria can be dismissed as fashionable trends. Ultimately, psychology individualises suffering, thereby locating defects within people rather than within a dysfunctional society. This disproportionately marginalises out-groups and contradicts claims that the field is liberally biased.