This chapter explores the status and methodology of contemporary metaphysics, particularly its relationship with other philosophical and non-philosophical disciplines such as the history of philosophy and science. Many, if not most, of the questions addressed in this textbook have their roots in the history of philosophy. In this respect, we argue that contemporary metaphysics is in direct continuity with the historical tradition of philosophy, while its distinctive character arises from the systematic use of logic—a tool that has significantly advanced the formulation and evaluation of metaphysical theories. The relationship between metaphysics and science is a central issue in the contemporary debate. While some argue that science marks the end of metaphysical inquiry, others maintain that metaphysical questions persist and can be reconciled with a scientific worldview. This chapter defends the latter position. The final section of this chapter addresses the epistemology of metaphysics, focusing on whether metaphysics can provide knowledge and, if so, how it is acquired. Here, we defend the view that a metaphysical theory comprises a set of general principles selected on the basis of theoretical virtues such as informativeness, simplicity, elegance, and other criteria.