The previous chapter detailed a realistic PRISM oscillation analysis, showing the sensitivity of PRISM to \(\Delta m^{2}_{32}\), \(\sin ^{2}\theta _{23}\), \(\sin ^{2}2\theta _{13}\) and \(\delta _{CP}\). However, this was an “Asimov-like” study, where the near and far detector “data” were identical to the MC production. In a real DUNE analysis the data will be whatever is measured by the detectors and the MC simulations will not necessarily provide an accurate model for every aspect of the data.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Oscillation Measurement Biases from the Neutrino Interaction Model

  • Ciaran Mark Hasnip

摘要

The previous chapter detailed a realistic PRISM oscillation analysis, showing the sensitivity of PRISM to \(\Delta m^{2}_{32}\), \(\sin ^{2}\theta _{23}\), \(\sin ^{2}2\theta _{13}\) and \(\delta _{CP}\). However, this was an “Asimov-like” study, where the near and far detector “data” were identical to the MC production. In a real DUNE analysis the data will be whatever is measured by the detectors and the MC simulations will not necessarily provide an accurate model for every aspect of the data.