Part II of this volume presents a comprehensive analysis of the national-level implementation of the Digital Markets Act (DMA) and Digital Services Act (DSA) across five European Union member states: Estonia, France, Germany, Italy, and Spain. By examining the institutional arrangements, regulatory responses, and challenges faced by these countries, the chapter reveals the complex landscape of digital regulation implementation. The research highlights variations in national approaches, demonstrating how different member states are adapting to the new EU digital rulebook. The analysis uncovers critical challenges in implementing these regulations, including potential regulatory fragmentation, overlapping national and EU-level enforcement mechanisms, and inherent difficulties in monitoring and enforcing digital markets and services rules. The comparative study provides insights into how different countries are balancing national regulatory autonomy with European harmonization, offering valuable lessons for policymakers and researchers interested in the evolving landscape of digital market governance. Ultimately, the research underscores the importance of adaptive, nuanced approaches to implementing comprehensive digital regulations across diverse European contexts.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Implementing the DMA and DSA: Comparing National Approaches in the EU

  • Alexandre de Streel,
  • Francesco Decarolis

摘要

Part II of this volume presents a comprehensive analysis of the national-level implementation of the Digital Markets Act (DMA) and Digital Services Act (DSA) across five European Union member states: Estonia, France, Germany, Italy, and Spain. By examining the institutional arrangements, regulatory responses, and challenges faced by these countries, the chapter reveals the complex landscape of digital regulation implementation. The research highlights variations in national approaches, demonstrating how different member states are adapting to the new EU digital rulebook. The analysis uncovers critical challenges in implementing these regulations, including potential regulatory fragmentation, overlapping national and EU-level enforcement mechanisms, and inherent difficulties in monitoring and enforcing digital markets and services rules. The comparative study provides insights into how different countries are balancing national regulatory autonomy with European harmonization, offering valuable lessons for policymakers and researchers interested in the evolving landscape of digital market governance. Ultimately, the research underscores the importance of adaptive, nuanced approaches to implementing comprehensive digital regulations across diverse European contexts.