This chapter examines the transformation of colonial geographical names in South Africa through a public policy lens, interrogating the socio-political significance of renaming as a restorative and constitutional imperative. Drawing on decoloniality theory and an analysis-centric approach, the study demonstrates how geographical naming, once a tool of colonial domination, has become a site of emancipatory policy intervention. Employing a hermeneutic methodology, it critically analyses three primary documents, the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa (1996), the South African Geographical Names Council Act 118 of 1998, and A Handbook on Geographical Names to explore the operational, technical, and symbolic dimensions of renaming practices. The chapter argues that renaming is not only a symbolic act of redress but also a policy mechanism requiring institutional capacity and governance reforms. It concludes by emphasising the need to align spatial transformation with constitutional values, restorative justice and the legacy of indigenous identities and struggle icons.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

What is in a Name? An Examination of Transforming Geographical Names from a Public Policy Perspective

  • Kedibone Phago

摘要

This chapter examines the transformation of colonial geographical names in South Africa through a public policy lens, interrogating the socio-political significance of renaming as a restorative and constitutional imperative. Drawing on decoloniality theory and an analysis-centric approach, the study demonstrates how geographical naming, once a tool of colonial domination, has become a site of emancipatory policy intervention. Employing a hermeneutic methodology, it critically analyses three primary documents, the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa (1996), the South African Geographical Names Council Act 118 of 1998, and A Handbook on Geographical Names to explore the operational, technical, and symbolic dimensions of renaming practices. The chapter argues that renaming is not only a symbolic act of redress but also a policy mechanism requiring institutional capacity and governance reforms. It concludes by emphasising the need to align spatial transformation with constitutional values, restorative justice and the legacy of indigenous identities and struggle icons.