“Primordial thinking” is thinking with auto-hetero affective intuitive sensibility which is animated and used by Wittgenstein’s configuring inventive thought experiments to trace and recollect the taking an ostensible form of a sense expression out of the manifest nexus of possible co-signifying configurations of proto-phenomenon. What is invented by heterogeneously imagining configurations of proto-phenomenon (urphänomen, which is later thematised by Heidegger as “Ereignis” (Both terms, although, are thematised to render transparent the manifest presupposed background presupposed as the possibility of the representation of sense differences fall short of the required transparency achieved by Wittgenstein’s recollecting by auto-hetero affective intuitive immediate touch with the internal connections of heterogeneously imagined as the possibilities of sense representation by external formal definitions of naming and describing) to render transparent by such thought experiments are the overarching immediate possibilities always presupposed (the manifest of Which Heidegger thematises as the “Event of “presencing”) for a sense expression to take the mediated homogenous particular anthropomorphic forms of our languages which are ruled to be used and followed as means and ends by external formal definitions of naming and describing concepts.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

The Possibilities of Aesthetic and Ethical Sensibility in Light of the Primordial Sense of Philosophizing

  • Erkut Sezgin

摘要

“Primordial thinking” is thinking with auto-hetero affective intuitive sensibility which is animated and used by Wittgenstein’s configuring inventive thought experiments to trace and recollect the taking an ostensible form of a sense expression out of the manifest nexus of possible co-signifying configurations of proto-phenomenon. What is invented by heterogeneously imagining configurations of proto-phenomenon (urphänomen, which is later thematised by Heidegger as “Ereignis” (Both terms, although, are thematised to render transparent the manifest presupposed background presupposed as the possibility of the representation of sense differences fall short of the required transparency achieved by Wittgenstein’s recollecting by auto-hetero affective intuitive immediate touch with the internal connections of heterogeneously imagined as the possibilities of sense representation by external formal definitions of naming and describing) to render transparent by such thought experiments are the overarching immediate possibilities always presupposed (the manifest of Which Heidegger thematises as the “Event of “presencing”) for a sense expression to take the mediated homogenous particular anthropomorphic forms of our languages which are ruled to be used and followed as means and ends by external formal definitions of naming and describing concepts.