Large language models (LLMs) represent a paradigmatic shift in how machines process and generate language, raising fundamental questions about the nature of understanding, computation, and the mind. Built on transformer architectures, these systems convert text into numerical embeddings and use sophisticated attention mechanisms to capture semantic relationships across entire sequences simultaneously. Through a detailed examination of tokenization, query-key-value operations, and multi-head attention, we investigate how transformers achieve their remarkable linguistic capabilities through self-supervised learning on massive datasets. However, their propensity for hallucinations—generating plausible but false information—uncovers deeper philosophical questions about the relationship between statistical pattern matching and genuine comprehension. The mechanisms underlying LLMs, from the mathematical foundations of attention to practical applications like prompt engineering and reinforcement learning from human feedback, reveal cybernetic principles of adaptive learning while challenging traditional distinctions between rule-following and creative expression. As these models blur the line between computational processes and cognitive phenomena, we question what constitutes understanding and whether statistical correlation can approximate meaning.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Large Language Models

  • Kristina Šekrst

摘要

Large language models (LLMs) represent a paradigmatic shift in how machines process and generate language, raising fundamental questions about the nature of understanding, computation, and the mind. Built on transformer architectures, these systems convert text into numerical embeddings and use sophisticated attention mechanisms to capture semantic relationships across entire sequences simultaneously. Through a detailed examination of tokenization, query-key-value operations, and multi-head attention, we investigate how transformers achieve their remarkable linguistic capabilities through self-supervised learning on massive datasets. However, their propensity for hallucinations—generating plausible but false information—uncovers deeper philosophical questions about the relationship between statistical pattern matching and genuine comprehension. The mechanisms underlying LLMs, from the mathematical foundations of attention to practical applications like prompt engineering and reinforcement learning from human feedback, reveal cybernetic principles of adaptive learning while challenging traditional distinctions between rule-following and creative expression. As these models blur the line between computational processes and cognitive phenomena, we question what constitutes understanding and whether statistical correlation can approximate meaning.