Large language models offer new opportunities for processing historical documents, yet their application raises questions of reliability. We present the first comprehensive and explainability-driven framework for evaluating model design bias in multilingual historical news article extraction, using newspaper coverage of the 1908 Messina earthquake as our test case across German, English, and French sources. Through systematic analysis of six state-of-the-art models, we uncover three critical bias patterns that, in addition to data quality, compromise extraction quality: contextual integration bias, overconfidence bias, and preference bias. Our evaluation reveals that these biases stem from alignment procedures rather than training data limitations, findings that establish methodological foundations for responsible AI deployment in digital humanities.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Studying Model Design Biases in LLMs for Multilingual Historical Newspaper Extraction; The Messina Earthquake Case Study

  • Sarah Oberbichler,
  • Johanna Mauermann,
  • The Trung Tran,
  • Carlos-Emiliano González-Gallardo

摘要

Large language models offer new opportunities for processing historical documents, yet their application raises questions of reliability. We present the first comprehensive and explainability-driven framework for evaluating model design bias in multilingual historical news article extraction, using newspaper coverage of the 1908 Messina earthquake as our test case across German, English, and French sources. Through systematic analysis of six state-of-the-art models, we uncover three critical bias patterns that, in addition to data quality, compromise extraction quality: contextual integration bias, overconfidence bias, and preference bias. Our evaluation reveals that these biases stem from alignment procedures rather than training data limitations, findings that establish methodological foundations for responsible AI deployment in digital humanities.